Guantánamo Bay
As part of an ongoing investigation in Poland into its collusion
with the CIA’s extraordinary rendition torture programme, particularly in
relation to Guantánamo prisoner Abu Zubaydah, who has already successfully
prosecuted the country for its involvement in crimes against humanity, a
hearing was held at the United States Supreme Court in a case brought by his
lawyers to order two CIA contractors, considered the architects of the extraordinary
rendition programme, to testify about the torture he faced at an illegal secret
CIA prison in Poland.
During the hearing, three of the nine judges on the panel asked why
he could not speak himself: ““Why not make the witness available? What is the
government’s objection to the witness testifying on his own treatment and not
requiring any addition from the government of any kind?” Justice Neil Gorsuch
asked.” At the same time, “The US government is blocking the request, arguing
that questioning [James] Mitchell and [John] Jessen would reveal “state
secrets”. After legal battles in the lower courts, the case has made it to the
Supreme Court.” The judges also questioned why Abu Zubaydah remained at
Guantánamo after so many years without charge or trial.
Lawyers for Abu Zubaydah, who has been held at Guantánamo without
charge or trial since 2006, after over three years of illegal secret detention
and torture by the CIA at locations around the world, have also filed cases at
the United Nations and may also do so in the UK to obtain further information
and details about the torture he faced.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/10/6/us-top-court-hears-guantanamo-detainee-state-secrets-case
Following
the hearing, the Biden administration said it would allow Abu Zubaydah to
testify in a written declaration to Polish investigators about the treatment he
received in CIA detention; however, his statement is likely to be redacted to
protect US torturers. The US government claims that nonetheless, this “would
not prevent him from describing his treatment while in CIA custody.”
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/10/18/us-to-allow-guantanamo-detainee-to-pen-letter-on-cia-mistreatment
Following this news, one of Abu Zubaydah’s lawyers David Klein,
wrote to the Supreme Court asking it to wait until the Biden administration
explains what it means about allowing Abu Zubaydah to make a written statement
and how much of it will be disclosed to the Polish investigators before
deciding on the case. In his letter, Klein stated: “the Government will allow
Abu Zubaydah to submit a written declaration about his treatment at the hands
of the CIA so long as the CIA authorizes it.”
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/guantanamo-lawyer-says-case-should-be-put-hold-supreme-court
Full
letter: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-827/197445/20211025123903253_AZ%202021.10.25%20Letter%20to%20Mr.%20Harris%204872-4094-1312%20v.1.pdf
The prisoner reviewer board has cleared two more prisoners for release.
Yemeni Sanad Yislam al-Kazimi, 51, and Afghan Assadullah Haroon Gul, 40, were
both cleared for release on 7 October by the review board. It has been
recommended that al-Kazimi is sent to Oman, in view of the ongoing war in Yemen. Neither
has been tried or charged while held at Guantánamo.
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20211014-us-approves-freeing-two-guantanamo-detainees
In Gul’s case, following a habeas corpus application to review his
prisoner status and grounds for detention filed in 2016, two weeks later, a US
judge granted his application and ruled that there is no legal basis for him to
be held at Guantánamo; such a ruling has not been made in over a decade. The
details and reasoning of the ruling remain classified.
In spite of this ruling, and two more prisoners being cleared for
release, it does not mean that any prisoners will be released soon or that
plans are underway to facilitate this.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/10/21/judge-says-us-held-afghan-militant-unlawfully-at-guantanamo-bay
Following their arraignment in late August, more than 15 years after
arriving at Guantánamo, one of two Malaysian prisoners in a case also involving
an Indonesian prisoner has filed a motion to have the arraignment, at which
they were given details of the charges against them, annulled as “a Malay
translator provided by the US government was incompetent and an Indonesian
translator helping the prosecution was biased.” Malaysian “Mohammed Nazir Lep
said the Indonesian translator had stated last year that “I don’t know why the government
is wasting so much money on these terrorists; they should have been killed a
long time ago”. A motion posted on the website of the US Military Commission’s
office said the “real and apparent bias prevented her from functioning as a
true, accurate and impartial voice of the court”.” At the hearing, the three
men refused to enter a plea, “citing incompetence of the translators which
resulted in inaccurate translations.” The matter also delayed the hearing.
Nazir’s lead counsel Brian Bouffard said “the US government had not secured a
competent Malay translator “despite the extraordinary amount of time the
government has had to prepare for the prosecution of this case”. Lawyers are
asking for the arraignment to held again, properly.
https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2021/10/18/malaysian-in-guantanamo-terror-trial-says-translator-was-biased/
The UAE has repatriated the remaining 12 Yemeni former Guantánamo
prisoners it accepted from the US between 2015 and 2017. A group of 6 others
were repatriated to Yemen in July where they were quickly released and reunited
with their families. The 12 men arrived in Yemen on 27 October and their
families were asked to come to a military base to meet them after release.
Although the UAE government has not commented, the Yemeni government has said
that those released in July received some funds from the UAE and Yemeni
governments. The UN and human rights organisations have condemned the forced
repatriations by the UAE and have claimed that the men were told to return to
Yemen or face indefinite detention in the UAE; they had been detained in some
form since their “release” from Guantánamo by the US to the country.
https://www.reuters.com/world/uae-sends-12-former-guantanamo-detainees-yemen-lawyer-official-2021-10-28/
During
his sentencing hearing, for the first time, Guantánamo prisoner Majid Khan
described some of the torture he suffered at the hands of the CIA. This torture
was used to extract his confession and convict him in a secret plea bargain.
Although he may be freed next year in spite of being given a 26-year sentence,
almost a decade after he was convicted, those involved in his torture remain
free, in spite of having committed crimes against humanity that were detailed
in the 2014 US Senate report into the CIA’s torture programme. He said he was
“left terrified and hallucinating”. “Khan spoke of being suspended naked from a
ceiling beam for long periods, doused repeatedly with ice water to keep him
awake for days. He described having his head held under water to the point of
near drowning, only to have water poured into his nose and mouth when the
interrogators let him up. He was beaten, given forced enemas, sexually
assaulted and starved in overseas prisons whose locations were not disclosed.
“I would beg them to stop and swear to them that I didn’t know anything,” said
Khan, reading from a 39-page statement. “If I had intelligence to give I would
have given it already but I didn’t have anything to give.””
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/oct/29/going-die-guantanamo-prisoner-torture-testimony
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/10/29/in-first-guatanamo-detainee-details-cia-torture-in-court