Tuesday, April 30, 2019

LGC Newsletter – April 2019

Guantánamo Bay
Majid Khan, who entered a plea bargain in February 2012 before the Guantánamo military commission, in which he agreed to testify against other prisoners, is due to be sentenced later this year, more than 7 years after he pleaded guilty to terrorism offences. In a pre-sentencing hearing in early April, his lawyers argued that his sentence should be reduced to less than the 19 years he agreed to in 2012; they argued that he should serve a shorter sentence in view of his ordeal in CIA custody. Khan, a former US resident who attended school there, was held in secret CIA prisons before being taken to Guantánamo. Part of his torture was outlined in the 2014 US Senate Committee report on extraordinary rendition: “He was sexually assaulted while hanging naked from the ceiling. Interrogators threatened to hammer his head, and threatened to harm his young sister. Majid lived in total darkness for much of 2003, and in solitary confinement from 2004 to 2006.”
The pre-sentencing hearing focused on whether or not the torture he suffered is a mitigating factor in his sentence. Prosecutors argued that he waived his right to the documents and witnesses his defence is now seeking to argue that.
The next pre-sentencing hearing in his case is set for early June.
The periodic review system set up by previous president Barack Obama is continuing to operate for prisoners held indefinitely without charge or trial to determine whether or not they can be released. When Donald Trump became president in early 2017, five prisoners had been cleared for release. They remain at Guantánamo, and only one prisoner, as part of his sentence, has been released under Trump. As a result, prisoners are increasingly boycotting the review system as there is little hope that they will be released. For many prisoners they are currently having their second or third hearing. At the end of March, Yemeni prisoner Suhayl Abdul Anam Al Sharabi did not attend, nor did his lawyer. He was instead represented by a government-appointed personal representative in a hearing that lasted 4 minutes. In recent months, other prisoners have also refused to cooperate with the process.

Pentagon prosecutors are seeking for the third time to charge three Guantánamo prisoners – Indonesian Hambali and two Malaysian prisoners, Mohd Farik Bin Amin and Mohammed Nazir Bin Lep – with murder, terrorism and conspiracy in the 2002 Bali bombings and the 2003 bombing of the Marriott Hotel in Jakarta. Between their kidnapping in 2003 through extraordinary rendition and their arrival at Guantánamo in 2006, the three men were held in secret CIA prisons at various locations around the world and severely tortured. As a result, the three are considered high-value prisoners and have limited access to the outside world. Prosecutors have chosen not to apply the death penalty and the three men could face life sentences if the charges are approved. Indonesia has already prosecuted the Bali bombings and executed three men convicted of carrying it out. The Indonesian prisoner Hambali was not linked to the attacks during this trial. Indonesia has no interest in trying Hambali and is not seeking his return to the country. The Obama administration had tried to have him extradited to Australia or Malaysia to stand trial there but there is a lack of evidence against him, which has seen the charges against him thrown previously. The family of one of the Malaysian men is hoping he is returned to Malaysia, even if he has to serve a life sentence there, rather than remain at Guantánamo.

On 16 April, a US court of appeal threw out all the pre-trial orders made over three and a half years in the case of Abd Al-Nashiri, facing the death penalty for his alleged role in the bombing of the USS Cole in Yemen in 2000, by the judge in the case, Air Force Colonel Vance Spath, as well as every ruling on appeals of his orders, as the judges held that Spath’s impartiality as a judge was questionable, given that he was simultaneously applying for the position of an immigration judge with the Justice Department. Al-Nashiri’s lawyers argued that the undeclared intention to seek work elsewhere – the judge left the case to retire – meant that his impartiality was questionable and the appeal court judges agreed. In their reasoning, the judges pointed out that while Judge Spath did not inform the parties that he was seeking employment elsewhere, the US government too refused to question him on it. The outcome of this decision sets proceedings in Al-Nashiri’s case back to where they were in November 2015, and thus will extend the period by which his case will go to trial, if at all. The ruling is a major blow to the military tribunal process and further undermines its credibility.

The Guantánamo camp commander, Navy Rear Admiral John Ring was abruptly relieved of his duties on 27 April, 7 weeks before he was due to be redeployed. No specific reason has been given but a “statement from US Southern Command said the change in leadership was “due to a loss of confidence in his ability to command”, and would “not interrupt the safe, humane, legal care and custody provided to the detainee population” at Guantánamo.” He had previously expressed his frustration at the lack of resources available to him for prisoner care. He had apparently been subject to an investigation unrelated to comments made to the media. His deputy, Army Brigadier General John Hussey has been made acting commander.
 

Extraordinary Rendition
The US revoked the entry visa for International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor Fatou Bensouda. The decision is thought to be in response to the Court’s investigation of the US and CIA’s potential war crimes in Afghanistan. The US has also threatened that other ICC staff working on this investigation and an investigation into Israel’s actions in the Occupied Palestinian Territories could be denied visas and entry to the US. The US is not a party to the ICC having not signed or ratified the Rome Statute.
A week later, judges at the ICC rejected Ms Bensouda’s request to open an investigation into war crimes in Afghanistan which would cover both offences by Afghan parties and the US and its allies. Judges cited the fact that it was unlikely that either the US or Afghan authorities and parties would cooperate.

In a rare public appearance at Auburn University, CIA director Gina Haspel, whose career has recently been the subject of a whitewashing campaign by the US media, was reminded of her role in torturing prisoners kidnapped by the CIA under the extraordinary rendition programme. She was talking about her career when a man in audience shouted “Tell these young children, tell them who you tortured. You know their names — they’re still in Guantánamo Bay”.
“You’re a decrepit human being,” he continued before being removed by security. “The only people you should be talking to is a prison guard in a jail cell.”

LGC Activities:
The April Shut Guantánamo! demo took place on 4 April. The May demonstration will be at 12-2pm on Thursday 2 May outside the US Embassy, 33 Nine Elms Lane, SW11 7US. Further details here: https://www.facebook.com/events/2694567797281798/ 

Sunday, March 31, 2019

LGC Newsletter – March 2019

Guantánamo Bay
The government stipend for rent and subsistence of former Guantánamo prisoners, all refugees, sent to Uruguay in 2014, has been renewed for a fifth year. The prisoners have cost the Uruguayan state $709,000 over the past four years. A state spokesperson said it would not be renewed again. Of the six sent to the country in 2014, 4 remain: Syrian refugee Jihad Diyab used a false passport to travel to Turkey to reunite with his family, and from where they have possibly been returned to Syria along with other Syrian refugees. Palestinian Mohammed Tahamatan has moved to Argentina and is unlikely to return to Uruguay. Of the four remaining former prisoners, Ahmed Ahjam, a Syrian refugee, has started a business selling Syrian sweets and the others have had small jobs and attended training courses but with no prospect of longer-term or full-time employment.

On 25 March, Alberta judge Mary Moreau ruled that Omar Khadr, former Canadian prisoner, had served his US prison sentence imposed by the Guantánamo military tribunal and ruled him free of any bail or further conditions. Khadr was released to Canada in 2012 and released on bail in 2015 pending his appeal of his conviction in the US. However, that has yet to start and is likely to take many years. Had he remained in prison, his sentence would have expired in October 2018. Thus his lawyers petitioned the court to consider Khadr to be in custody for one further day and then rule him to have served his sentence, which the judge did, and then allowed him to walk free. Although his restrictions have been reduced over the past few years, restrictions remained on his ability to obtain a passport, travel abroad and within Canada and communication with his sister. The ruling should allow him to get on with his life normally while pursuing his US appeal.

Lawyer of Indonesian prisoner Hambali, real name Encep Nurjaman, Major James Valentine has stated that in spite of the US laying formal charges against him last year, first initiated under the Obama administration, the US government is unlikely to take the case to court “because it "can never reveal to the world" how brutally he was tortured”. Instead, he is asking the Indonesian government to use its powers to charge Hambali for offences he is alleged to have committed there and to have him returned to the country to stand trial. His family are also calling for his return to Indonesia, even if it means further imprisonment. Other defendants in the 2003 Bali bombing, which he is accused of involvement in, have already been tried, convicted and executed in Indonesia. The Obama administration had previously sought to have him extradited to Malaysia as he would also face the death penalty there. After he was kidnapped and extraordinarily rendered, he was held in secret CIA prisons where he was brutally tortured – his lawyer says he shows the physical effects of this – before being sent to Guantánamo where he is held in a top-secret block with little access to anyone else. Although the offences for which the US would like to try Hambali took place in Indonesia, the Indonesian government has shown no interest in prosecuting him.

Former Mauritanian prisoner Mohamedou Ould Slahi has been denied a passport by the Mauritanian government to travel abroad and receive medical treatment. Upon release three years ago, he was told that he could apply for a passport after two years but this has been denied. His petition to the Mauritanian government has been supported by hundreds of writers and authors worldwide. Many former prisoners face restrictions on their ability to obtain a passport and travel.

The latest pre-trial hearing in the case of Abdul Hadi Al-Iraqi lasted two hours after his counsel requested a meeting with him, a rare event due to his poor health and his needing days to recover after being moved to the courthouse. At the start of the hearing Al-Iraqi told the judge that he would not be able to follow the proceedings as his medication was making him drowsy, but the judge decided to continue. However, his lead defense counsel, Susan Hensler, suffered severe dehydration and had to be treated at the base hospital. Hearings in his case will not resume now until July.

In the case of five men accused of involvement in attacks on New York in September 2001, pre-trial hearings continued in late March. These focused on the details of recorded phone calls allegedly involving Khalid Shaikh Mohammad and three of his co-defendants in the months before the attacks which the US government claims involved coded communication on plans for the attacks. The issue was raised by James Connell, lead counsel for Ammar Al-Baluchi, as part of his challenge of “a protective order – what he called a “gag order” – preventing the defense teams from making any inquiries, including in closed court sessions, that might touch upon the sources and methods of how the recordings were obtained.” Connell also argued that the “court’s acceptance of the government summary without cross examination of government personnel with knowledge of the “how” and the “when” of the recordings would violate his client’s constitutional right to confront witnesses.” Other lawyers refused to take part in these pre-trial hearings over issues over interference by the FBI through the interrogation of a paralegal about the defence teams and a possible conflict of interest. Much of the hearings were held in closed session.

Extraordinary Rendition:
The inquiry into the use of Scottish airports for CIA torture flights has finally ended after more than five years. A police inquiry was ordered in 2013. As part of the investigation Scottish police asked to see the full 6000-page 2014 Senate Intelligence Committee report into extraordinary rendition. This request was never granted. Scottish airports were used for stopovers and refuelling on up to a dozen occasions at least. The outcome of the inquiry could see prosecutions of CIA officials.

LGC Activities:
The March Shut Guantánamo! demo took place on 7 March. The April demonstration will be at 12-2pm on Thursday 4 April outside the US Embassy, 33 Nine Elms Lane, SW11 7US. Further details here: https://www.facebook.com/events/1001212076743659/

Thursday, February 28, 2019

LGC Newsletter – February 2019

Guantánamo Bay
Former Canadian prisoner Omar Khadr, 32, brought a case before the Alberta youth court on 26 February 2019, seeking to have his bail conditions, which impose restrictions on his everyday life, lifted. Khadr was convicted at Guantánamo in 2010 in a secret plea deal on the charge of allegedly murdering a US serviceman when he was 15 in Afghanistan. Returned to Canada in 2012 to serve the rest of his sentence there, he was released from a maximum security prison by a youth court in 2015 on the basis of a number of bail restrictions, many of which have been relaxed over the past few years but which still require him to seek permission to travel in Canada and deprive him of a passport, among other things. Effectively, had he remained in jail, Khadr’s sentence would have expired over 5 months ago. Although Canada apologised to Khadr and reached an out-of-court settlement with him over its failure to protect his human rights, he remains subject, in Canada, to a ruling made by the highly controversial Guantánamo military tribunal, with evidence obtained from torture used to try him. Khadr asked the court to order his release and declare his sentence to have expired by having the judge place him under conditional supervision for one day and then declare his sentence served. The judge hearing the case said she will rule on the case in March. According to his lawyer, Nate Whitling: “The bail order does interrupt the ticking of the clock but practically speaking, the guy has served his sentence now.” and, in the meantime, his appeal in the US, pending which he was released on bail, has not advanced “even an inch”.
 

Extraordinary Rendition:
A second case has been brought against Lithuania at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg by a Guantánamo prisoner, Saudi Mustafa Al-Hawsawi, who is currently facing trial with four other men suspected of involvement in the September 2001 attacks in New York. The Lithuanian government has decided to challenge the case, and consistently denies the existence of any CIA torture prisons in its territory. Concerning Al-Hawsawi, it claims: “We have no tangible or reasonable evidence whatsoever that the person could have been in Lithuania”, and that “the suspected building in Antaviliai, in the outskirts of Vilnius, had been "an intelligence support center" and that the suspected planes had transported communication equipment rather than people to Lithuania”, even though Lithuania previously lost a case at the court whereby it was fined for having colluded in CIA torture through running a torture facility. It is currently appealing that judgment made last year.
Lawyers and NGOs acting for Al-Hawsawi previously urged the Lithuanian government to include him in its investigation into secret CIA torture prisons in the country, ongoing since 2015. However, refusal by the district court in Lithuania in 2016 to grant him the victim status that would allow his inclusion in the investigation led lawyers to take the case to the Strasbourg Court.
According to the NGO Redress: “Mr. al-Hawsawi was captured in Pakistan in 2003 and was held in secret detention in the CIA’s rendition, detention, and interrogation programme until September 2006.
During this time he was severely tortured and now suffers from a number of serious medical conditions, including rectal prolapse, anal fissures, and Hepatitis C, a condition he did not have previously.
The United States Senate Torture Report – the most comprehensive examination of the CIA’s Torture programme – indicates that while Mr. al-Hawsawi was held in Lithuania he required emergency medical care, which was delayed because he was denied access to a local hospital.
Throughout his three and a half years’ secret detention– including the time he was detained in Lithuania – Mr. al-Hawsawi was not allowed access to a lawyer or to independent monitors (such as the International Committee of the Red Cross).
He was tortured and detained outside the protection of the law in conditions that amounted to enforced disappearance.

Lawyers for fellow defendant in the September 2001 case, Ammar Al-Baluchi, have claimed that the makers of the film Zero Dark Thirty were given detailed information about his torture in a secret CIA prison, information that has been denied to his lawyers. According to his lawyers, “they were stunned to see the portrayal of his torture, including beatings, suspension from manacles and waterboarding, in the Oscar-winning 2012 film. The lawyers discovered that in the CIA’s year-long cooperation with the film-makers, the agency shared details of Baluchi’s torture at a secret prison, or black site, which they had been told were too secret to be divulged.”
This disclosure was made as part of a new film by The Guardian on the Guantánamo military tribunals: https://www.theguardian.com/law/video/2019/feb/22/the-trial-inside-guantanamo-with-911-suspect-ammar-al-baluchi-video
On 27 February, lawyers for Al-Baluchi brought a case before the federal courts to have the death penalty aspect of the case against him at Guantanamo removed, on the basis of the torture he has suffered and that almost seven years after the charges were brought against him (and four others), no trial date has been set. If successful, the case could see his trial before the military commission at a later stage invalidated.

LGC Activities:
The February Shut Guantánamo! demo took place on 7 February. The March demonstration will be at 12-2pm on Thursday 7 March outside the US Embassy, 33 Nine Elms Lane, SW11 7US. Further details here: https://www.facebook.com/events/287164098647551/

Thursday, January 31, 2019

LGC Newsletter – January 2019


Guantánamo Bay
The new judge in the Abd Al Nashiri capital case, in which he is accused of masterminding an attack on a US naval vessel in the Gulf of Aden in 2000, is leaving the case to become an immigration judge. As the case is currently awaiting rulings from other higher courts on various issues, Air Force Col. Shelley Schools has not yet presided the case and may never do so. She is reported to have applied to become an immigration judge in April 2018, 4 months before she was assigned to Al Nashiri’s case, and to have accepted the post which will start in the summer.
 

The previous judge, Air Force Col. Vance Spath, left for retirement and has since become an immigration judge too. On 22 January, District of Columbia Court of Appeals heard arguments from Al Nashiri’s lawyer on whether he should have disclosed that he had been seeking this job for almost three years. They argued that all rulings he made during that period should be nullified, due to “an undisclosed conflict of interest, noting that for years, he was angling for an appointment with the Justice Department while advancing Nashiri’s case on terms favorable to the prosecution team.” Michel Paradis, a lawyer representing Al Nashiri said “that Spath had used one of his rulings favorable to the Justice Department in Nashiri’s case as a writing sample for his application.” https://theintercept.com/2019/01/23/guantanamo-military-commision-abd-rahim-nashiri/
A new judge in the case will the fourth to handle the pre-trial proceedings in this case which are currently halted.

 
Pre-trial hearings have continued in other cases at Guantánamo nonetheless. On Monday 7 January, pre-trial hearings started in the case of Abd al Hadi Al-Iraqi. The main open discussion related to his health and ability to attend hearings. Since September 2017, he has had 5 operations to his spine and various other hearings have been halted due to the pain he finds himself in. A neurosurgeon was called to the court to testify on his ability to travel to the courtroom. The hearings on Wednesday and Thursday were held in closed court.
By the end of the week it was decided that instead of adjourning or throwing out the case before the military tribunal, which is based on torture and other inadmissible evidence, and is a case in which the defendant claims they do not even have his correct name, the prosecutor announced that a hospital bed could be brought into the courtroom compound so that Al-Iraqi can watch proceedings from the bed in an adjacent room with a video feed and phone line to the court. The special cell containing this will arrive at Guantánamo in March. It will be the first time that a prisoner spends the night in the court compound.
A trial date has been set in his case, for 19 February 2020. The date was set after the lead prosecutor said that by March 2019 the facilities for Al-Iraqi to stay at the courthouse during hearings would be ready. The next pre-trial hearings in his case are set for 4-8 March.

Pre-trial hearings resumed briefly in the case of five men accused of involvement in the September 2001 attacks in New York. The hearing started off disruptively on Monday 28 January with the defendants claiming they could answer the judge’s questions as they questioned his authority to preside the case. Their lawyers, on the other hand, asked for the hearing to be delayed so that the government could provide “more information about the FBI’s recent interrogation of a former paralegal from one of the defense teams. Lawyers said they needed the details to determine if they were operating under a conflict of interest and assailed what they said was another attempt by the government to disrupt their work through criminal investigations, intrusions and harassment.” Given previous harassment and surveillance by the government of defence lawyers in the case going back several years, one of the lawyers, James Harrington, explained that “There’s a real basis for our paranoia”. Stating that he had received information that none of the lawyers were being investigated, Judge Marine Col. Keith Parrella decided to continue.
More on the questioning of the paralegal: https://www.idahostatesman.com/news/local/article225208845.html
However, on Tuesday, the hearing ended suddenly when the judge had a health emergency: he had a detached retina and had to be flown to Miami for emergency surgery. There was a delay in his departure concerning which his wife claimed on social media that military insurance refused to transport him and the military claimed there was no aircraft available. The next hearings are due to be held in late March.

LGC Activities:
The LGC held its first monthly Shut Guantánamo! demos outside the US Embassy in Nine Elms on Thursday 3 January. The February demonstration will be at 12-2pm on Thursday 7 February outside the US Embassy, 33 Nine Elms Lane, SW11 7US. Further details here: https://www.facebook.com/events/376841939785822/

On Friday 11 January, the 17th anniversary of Guantánamo Bay opening, activists from the London Guantánamo joined an event organised by the Guantánamo Justice Campaign in Trafalgar Square to mark the anniversary. The very visual event attracted passers-by, many of whom stopped to talk and express their solidarity. Many were not aware that it is still open and some were under the impression that the prisoners are convicted terrorists, whereas with two exceptions, none of the prisoners have been convicted and over half face no charges or trial after 17 years.